safelane sf is bad as he really need the exp, early raze are good, his ulti is good, and reduction armor is good, you can't really miss exp with him.
needs exp, so unless you are safelane SF against solo offlane *insert REALLY shitty solo hero here*, mid is way better.
safe sf is fine, given that the support is good. what i mean by good support is the one that doesn't pull like a retard and lets you have lots of solo EXP. also, midas can counteract the exp loss.
if enemy team has no Potm, go mid. If they have a Potm, go safelane and spam "we need wards" until you see the entire map. ez game.
safelane sf with midas will equate to a midlaner at 12 minute mark if he gets midas at 5 min, granted he midases big creeps , even better if you got a puller/stacker
not many carries are being able to farm a tri stack big camps at level 5 eh,
well at least it works once or twice in my pool
^
what does "have a point on that" mean?
Wave is right. Most likely referring to the position of the hard camp for clearing stacks.
yea big camps are nearer on dire side for some point but enemy will make a use out of it i think, and certain wards placed blocks that camp
sf safe lane is so bad, he needs the solo xp from mid as well as runes for bottle to spam razes.
^
SF safe lane isn't bad. Your supports not staying out of your carries xp range is bad.
There is a difference.
Pro psaní komentáře se přihlaste.
Yes I have a pretty shitty winrate for sf :V
anyways don't people think sf on a safelane with supports stacking big camps constantly works pretty well for a flash farming carry or just they prefer a mid that can constantly zone out the creepwave and secure runes better?