of course not (is what i believe), people are free to think otherwise
Of course. If I'm a fantastic Chen, but a crap Shadow Shaman, my MMR will be higher when I continue to play the heroes I am good at.
That sad, it's not a negative thing. Judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, and it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid.'
i do think this applies for a majority of the dota 2 community most people know only play a select pool of heroes well and feel comfortable with them my friend is 5k mmr and plays a killer puck but other heroes he plays like a 2k mmr player lol
Imo you should have a few heroes from all roles that you feel comfortable with. No one forces you to know all supps, but out of 5 you should be able to play at least 1.
my MMR increased from 4400 to 4915 when I spammed TA and when I realised I can't really play other heroes as well, then I started randoming and went down to 4200.
Nowadays, I random in 1/3 of my games, 1/3 I play support because cores are instalocked, and the other 1/3 i get to play cores. I sit between 4600-4800 and don't have much improvement of MMR. Anyone knows what to do??
People often don't realise how you improve with all the heroes without actually playing them. I think I have never played Warlock in my life, yet I think I'd make a decent Warlock mid because I know how it works, if I counterpick a TA I'm pretty sure I'd rape her mid (unless she's like way better than me)
![[Lk].Zano](https://steamcdn-a.akamaihd.net/steamcommunity/public/images/avatars/b9/b98e01ce6ef4a5e926a44cdd1564d0e8e5fbfa36_full.jpg "[Lk].Zano")
Pro psaní komentáře se přihlaste.
And that your MMR really represents your top 5 hero? and when you play your most unplayed hero your MMR would not be represented accurately? thoughts?