^ only increases proc chance and both can proc at the same time yet you only get 1 dmg output, not reliable, better to go for a diffusal or aghs daedelus build
It really depends on the hero. If you know you wont be jumped/can get out of being jumped 2 maelstroms might be better since the active on mjolnir wont do shit
But if you're melee then mjolnir is better
With increased AS may have the same number of lightnings. U have less proc chance but much higher AS. Closer to the late game u will have to sell one of ur maels as u will need a slot. 2 mjollnirs in the lategame are not effective
More AS, stronger chain, 12 vs 4 bounces on chain and STATIC SHIELD. Why is this even asked?
but think of double maelstrom vs mjoll on ember for example
although who buys maelstrom on ember anyway nowadays..
Dual mael only on ember or WR
But then again it's not effective, wasting slots for diminishing stacks?
No thanks
Which is why I get triggered by double daedalus bullshit
Double daed may give diminishing returns, but critical strike amounts to much more value than chain lightning, and can farm at a much faster speed with cleave. Especially on core kunkka and ember who need to land crits more frequently and reliably that other heroes and both have or buy cleave, its pretty good.
https://www.dotabuff.com/matches/2666871377
I wud always go for mjollnir, as the attack speed, proc DMG (num of chains and chain DMG), and shield r really good. 2 maelstrom is inefficient.
"slots are not an issue. "
slots are always an issue which makes this a dumb question. If slots weren't an issue then a million iron branches would be best build.
2 crystalis has a highr crit than 1 daedalus so
2 maelstrom is probably better than 1 mjolnir
Pro psaní komentáře se přihlaste.
Discuss,
slots are not an issue.
Take in account the active of mjolnir.